Turkish vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Malaysian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Malaysians
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
29.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,983,530 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 24.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 17.9% |
| Range | 15.5% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 6.9% |
| Median | 3.6% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from the Azores (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
| Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
| South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
| Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
| Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
| Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |