Turkish vs Immigrants from Micronesia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,488,987 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 27.2%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Turkish	Immigrants from Micronesia
Minimum	0.78%	1.0%
Maximum	16.2%	19.3%
Range	15.5%	18.3%
Mean	4.6%	7.2%
Median	3.6%	5.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.6%	4.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	4.9%	7.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.4%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.6%	4.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.5%	4.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Scottish	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 4.3%
Swiss	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 4.3%
Serbians	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.3%
British	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.3%
Australians	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.3%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.3%
Welsh	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.3%
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	14.4 /100 \| #210	Poor 5.5%
Nigerians	14.3 /100 \| #211	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Thailand	14.0 /100 \| #212	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Liberia	13.3 /100 \| #213	Poor 5.5%
Iroquois	13.1 /100 \| #214	Poor 5.5%
Armenians	12.8 /100 \| #215	Poor 5.5%
Potawatomi	12.4 /100 \| #216	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	11.3 /100 \| #217	Poor 5.5%