Thai vs Maltese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Thai
Maltese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Thais
Maltese
17.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Maltese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,874,007 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 17.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,419,200 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 5.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Thai | Maltese |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 44.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.7% | 96.7% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 25.4% |
| Median | 13.9% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 20.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Thais and Maltese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 0.99%), Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 1.7%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 1.9%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from China (18.1%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |