Thai vs Immigrants from Lithuania Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Thai
Immigrants from Lithuania
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Thais
Immigrants from Lithuania
17.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Immigrants from Lithuania Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,874,007 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 17.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,892,262 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Thai | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 44.0% | 30.7% |
| Range | 41.7% | 26.6% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 14.7% |
| Median | 13.9% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Thais and Immigrants from Lithuania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 0.99%), Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 1.7%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 1.9%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |