South African vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Pima
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Pima
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,779,474 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.933 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 149.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.00% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 35.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 34.3% | 96.4% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 19.6% |
| Median | 4.4% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Turkey (4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (4.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (4.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Croatia (4.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (4.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Icelanders | 99.0 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Bolivians | 98.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 98.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Basques | 98.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 98.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |