South African vs New Zealander Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
South African
New Zealander
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
South Africans
New Zealanders
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs New Zealander Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,779,474 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.933 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,591,527 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | New Zealander |
Minimum | 1.00% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 35.3% | 11.9% |
Range | 34.3% | 10.8% |
Mean | 6.2% | 4.4% |
Median | 4.4% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and New Zealanders by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Turkey (4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (4.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Croatia (4.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Denmark (4.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Canadian (4.5%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Slavic (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from North America (4.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from England (4.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.1 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Icelanders | 99.0 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 4.6% |