Russian vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Russian
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Russians
Turks
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,513,768 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 0.13%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 64.7% | 16.2% |
| Range | 63.1% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 4.6% |
| Median | 4.1% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and British (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |