Belgian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Belgian
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Belgians
Pima
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belgian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,783,790 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.568 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 86.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Belgian | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 11.0% |
| Maximum | 29.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 28.6% | 89.0% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 41.2% |
| Median | 11.4% | 34.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 57.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 36.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Belgians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Sri Lankan (15.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Denmark (15.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |