German vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
German
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Germans
Pima
14.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
German vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,937,968 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Germans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 89.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | German | Pima |
Minimum | 4.2% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 95.8% | 89.0% |
Mean | 18.0% | 41.2% |
Median | 13.3% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Germans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Immigrants from Switzerland (14.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from France (14.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (14.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from North America (14.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Basque (15.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |