Irish vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Irish
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Irish
Pima
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,406,240 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 84.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Irish | Pima |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 11.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 95.2% | 89.0% |
| Mean | 29.4% | 41.2% |
| Median | 15.3% | 34.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.1% | 57.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.5% | 36.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.7% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.6% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Irish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and English (15.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |