Northern European vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Northern European
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Northern Europeans
Pima
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Northern European vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 396,909,088 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 90.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Northern European | Pima |
Minimum | 7.8% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 62.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.1% | 89.0% |
Mean | 24.2% | 41.2% |
Median | 19.0% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.2% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.5% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Northern Europeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |