Yakama vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Yakama
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Yakama
Pima
22.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,841,501 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 25.1%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Pima |
Minimum | 2.0% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 87.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 85.7% | 89.0% |
Mean | 29.9% | 41.2% |
Median | 25.6% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.0% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.8% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.4% | 25.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 0.80%), Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and Central American Indian (22.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 9.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |