Zimbabwean vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Pima
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,044,520 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 96.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 11.0% |
| Maximum | 29.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 28.8% | 89.0% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 41.2% |
| Median | 9.2% | 34.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 57.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 36.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |