Immigrants from China vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 118.8%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Pima
Minimum	0.83%	10.7%
Maximum	42.3%	100.0%
Range	41.4%	89.3%
Mean	12.6%	38.9%
Median	10.7%	35.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.6%	22.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.9%	51.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	29.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.2%	23.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.1%	22.6%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Okinawans	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Asians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.5%
Cypriots	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Swedes	99.8 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.6%
Turks	99.8 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.6%
Danes	99.8 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.6%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.8 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.6%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Luxembourgers	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.9%

Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Apache	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 24.5%
Blacks/African Americans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 24.5%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 24.7%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 25.3%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 25.8%
Hopi	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 25.9%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 26.2%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 26.3%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 28.9%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 29.7%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 30.3%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 30.6%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 31.6%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #346	Tragic 31.9%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #347	Tragic 32.8%