Immigrants from China vs Pima Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Pima
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Pima
14.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Pima Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,182,579 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,926,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.43% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 57.1% |
| Range | 30.3% | 51.6% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 23.0% |
| Median | 13.9% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 27.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 14.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Pima by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Malaysian (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Bhutanese (15.0%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Indian (Asian) (14.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (14.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Asia (14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Bolivian (14.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 15.0% |