Maltese vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Maltese
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Maltese
Pima
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 105.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 11.0% |
| Maximum | 80.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 79.3% | 89.0% |
| Mean | 18.7% | 41.2% |
| Median | 15.0% | 34.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 57.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 36.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |