Immigrants from Argentina vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Chickasaw
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
89.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,308,619 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 27.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 42.3% | 33.0% |
| Range | 39.8% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 15.0% |
| Median | 9.9% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Turkey (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Argentinean (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Palestinian (10.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Albanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |