Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Chickasaw
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,546,988 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 44.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.33% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 52.6% | 33.0% |
| Range | 52.3% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 15.0% |
| Median | 6.8% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |