Immigrants from Argentina vs Immigrants from South Africa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Immigrants from South Africa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Immigrants from South Africa
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
89.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Immigrants from South Africa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,308,619 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,179,579 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.815 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 42.3% | 75.0% |
Range | 39.8% | 73.9% |
Mean | 11.2% | 11.9% |
Median | 9.9% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 13.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from South Africa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Turkey (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Argentinean (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Albanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Portuguese (10.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |