Spanish American Indian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Chickasaw
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,141,857 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 2.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 47.0% | 33.0% |
| Range | 40.0% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 15.2% | 15.0% |
| Median | 12.4% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |