Immigrants from Argentina vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Chickasaw
11.7%
POVERTY
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,354,421 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 25.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 31.1% | 35.7% |
| Range | 29.9% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 16.2% |
| Median | 10.9% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Israel (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
| South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
| French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |