Celtic vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Chickasaw
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
47.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,829,630 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 20.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 33.0% |
| Range | 99.8% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 15.0% |
| Median | 11.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Fiji (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Lebanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (11.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
| Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
| Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 39.5 /100 | #181 | Fair 11.3% |
| Mongolians | 39.0 /100 | #182 | Fair 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |