Immigrants from Fiji vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Fiji
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Fiji
Chickasaw
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Fiji vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,752,822 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.959 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 20.1%.
![Immigrants from Fiji vs Chickasaw Male Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/male-poverty/immigrants-from-fiji-vs-chickasaw-male-poverty-chart.webp)
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Fiji | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 77.3% | 33.0% |
Range | 74.2% | 30.8% |
Mean | 13.7% | 15.0% |
Median | 11.1% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Fiji by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Lebanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Celtic (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cameroon (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 39.5 /100 | #181 | Fair 11.3% |
Mongolians | 39.0 /100 | #182 | Fair 11.3% |
Kenyans | 38.4 /100 | #183 | Fair 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |