Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Chickasaw
15.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,052,023 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 13.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 94.9% | 33.0% |
| Range | 93.0% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 23.8% | 15.0% |
| Median | 17.9% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.5% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.1% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Colville (15.2%, a difference of 0.48%), Kiowa (15.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |