Immigrants from Canada vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Canada
Chickasaw
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,819,233 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 31.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Canada | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 33.0% |
| Range | 98.8% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 21.2% | 15.0% |
| Median | 14.1% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.5% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.2% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are European (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (10.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Australia (10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Dutch | 96.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |