Luxembourger vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Chickasaw
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 41.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 33.0% |
| Range | 16.3% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 15.0% |
| Median | 6.1% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |