Bolivian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Chickasaw
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,589,682 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 43.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 29.9% | 33.0% |
| Range | 28.3% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 8.6% | 15.0% |
| Median | 7.5% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |