Finnish vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Finnish
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Finns
Chickasaw
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,315,970 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 29.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Finnish | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 47.7% | 33.0% |
| Range | 43.9% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 12.3% | 15.0% |
| Median | 10.8% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Finns by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |