Mongolian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Chickasaw
11.3%
MALE POVERTY
39.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,285,777 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 19.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.97% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 33.0% |
| Range | 18.5% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 15.0% |
| Median | 9.6% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Kenyan (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Syria (11.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South America (11.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
| Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 39.5 /100 | #181 | Fair 11.3% |
| Mongolians | 39.0 /100 | #182 | Fair 11.3% |
| Kenyans | 38.4 /100 | #183 | Fair 11.3% |
| Immigrants | South America | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 33.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 32.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 31.9 /100 | #187 | Fair 11.4% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 29.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.4% |
| Hawaiians | 28.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |