Colville vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Colville
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Colville
Chinese
23.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,640,964 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 23.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 93.2%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colville | Chinese |
Minimum | 9.3% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 93.0% | 56.0% |
Range | 83.7% | 53.7% |
Mean | 35.9% | 14.3% |
Median | 32.6% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.0% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.3% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.7% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.4% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Colville by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Menominee (23.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Honduras (22.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Congo (22.5%, a difference of 2.3%), Central American Indian (22.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Paiute (22.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 23.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |