Colville vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Colville
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Colville
Chinese
13.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,676,230 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 99.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colville | Chinese |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 37.1% | 19.1% |
| Range | 32.8% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 17.5% | 6.8% |
| Median | 14.0% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.5% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Colville by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Paiute (13.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Yakama (13.1%, a difference of 0.68%), Immigrants from Dominica (12.7%, a difference of 2.0%), Menominee (12.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and Central American Indian (13.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |