Chinese vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,433,461 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 74.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago |
Minimum | 0.44% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 81.8% |
Range | 16.7% | 80.9% |
Mean | 4.2% | 6.9% |
Median | 3.3% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.25%), West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |