Chinese vs Immigrants from Singapore Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Singapore
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Singapore
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Singapore Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,997,668 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 12.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Singapore |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 20.5% |
| Range | 16.7% | 19.7% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 4.1% |
| Median | 3.3% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Singapore by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.64%), Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Italian (4.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |