Chinese vs Inupiat Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Inupiat
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Inupiat
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Inupiat Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,004,773 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 95.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 50.7% |
| Range | 16.7% | 49.0% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 14.0% |
| Median | 3.3% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 12.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Honduran (7.2%, a difference of 0.15%), British West Indian (7.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Mexican (7.2%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (7.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (7.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.3% |