Chinese vs Immigrants from Cuba Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Cuba
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Cuba
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Cuba Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,285,168 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 104.9%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Cuba |
Minimum | 0.44% | 0.42% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 19.2% |
Range | 16.7% | 18.8% |
Mean | 4.2% | 8.0% |
Median | 3.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Bangladesh (7.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Hispanic or Latino (7.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Central America (7.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Vietnamese (7.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Mexico (7.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.3% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.3% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |