Chinese vs Immigrants from Greece Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Greece
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Greece
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Greece Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,639,797 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.837 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 24.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Greece |
Minimum | 0.44% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 39.5% |
Range | 16.7% | 38.5% |
Mean | 4.2% | 5.0% |
Median | 3.3% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Greece by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Greece are Icelander (4.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Iran (4.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Canadian (4.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Denmark (4.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Scotch-Irish (4.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.1 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Icelanders | 99.0 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Bolivians | 98.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 4.6% |