Chinese vs Afghan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Afghan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Afghans
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
11.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Afghan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,344,373 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 51.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Afghan |
Minimum | 0.44% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 21.6% |
Range | 16.7% | 20.8% |
Mean | 4.2% | 6.4% |
Median | 3.3% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Nigeria (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Japanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |