Chinese vs European Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
European
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Europeans
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs European Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,741,154 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 15.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | European |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 65.0% |
| Range | 16.7% | 64.0% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 9.7% |
| Median | 3.3% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are English (4.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Iranian (4.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Belgian (4.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Dutch (4.2%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |