Celtic vs Immigrants from Spain Male Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from Spain
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from Spain
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
47.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
55.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Immigrants from Spain Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,829,630 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,541,780 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.80%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Immigrants from Spain |
Minimum | 0.22% | 0.62% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 25.4% |
Range | 99.8% | 24.7% |
Mean | 14.6% | 9.4% |
Median | 11.2% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Spain by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Fiji (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Lebanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (11.2%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Portugal (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |