Celtic vs Chickasaw Householder Income Over 65 years
COMPARE
Celtic
Chickasaw
Householder Income Over 65 years
Householder Income Over 65 years Comparison
Celtics
Chickasaw
$60,608
HOUSEHOLDER INCOME OVER 65 YEARS
40.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
$53,732
HOUSEHOLDER INCOME OVER 65 YEARS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Chickasaw Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,665,390 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of $60,608. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732, a difference of 12.8%.
Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Chickasaw |
Minimum | $16,365 | $22,146 |
Maximum | $127,250 | $78,125 |
Range | $110,885 | $55,979 |
Mean | $55,793 | $46,305 |
Median | $53,750 | $45,875 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $41,861 | $38,542 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $65,041 | $53,486 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $23,179 | $14,944 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $20,641 | $12,086 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $20,507 | $12,005 |
Similar Demographics by Householder Income Over 65 years
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Householder Income Over 65 years
In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Czechoslovakian ($60,581, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Morocco ($60,647, a difference of 0.060%), Welsh ($60,666, a difference of 0.10%), Kenyan ($60,514, a difference of 0.15%), and Yup'ik ($60,727, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Householder Income Over 65 years |
Luxembourgers | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average $60,967 |
Spaniards | 47.3 /100 | #175 | Average $60,866 |
Spanish | 45.5 /100 | #176 | Average $60,795 |
Alaska Natives | 44.3 /100 | #177 | Average $60,748 |
Yup'ik | 43.7 /100 | #178 | Average $60,727 |
Welsh | 42.2 /100 | #179 | Average $60,666 |
Immigrants | Morocco | 41.7 /100 | #180 | Average $60,647 |
Celtics | 40.7 /100 | #181 | Average $60,608 |
Czechoslovakians | 40.0 /100 | #182 | Average $60,581 |
Kenyans | 38.4 /100 | #183 | Fair $60,514 |
Iraqis | 37.2 /100 | #184 | Fair $60,466 |
Albanians | 32.0 /100 | #185 | Fair $60,249 |
Slovenes | 31.8 /100 | #186 | Fair $60,241 |
Immigrants | Thailand | 31.3 /100 | #187 | Fair $60,217 |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 28.6 /100 | #188 | Fair $60,096 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Householder Income Over 65 years
In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Householder Income Over 65 years |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic $53,967 |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic $53,950 |
Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic $53,897 |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic $53,847 |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic $53,766 |
Paiute | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic $53,762 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic $53,737 |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #290 | Tragic $53,732 |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic $53,711 |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic $53,681 |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic $53,665 |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic $53,591 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic $53,420 |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic $53,333 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic $53,265 |