Celtic vs Chickasaw Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Celtic
Chickasaw
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Celtics
Chickasaw
24.2%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
6.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.2%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Chickasaw Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,782,457 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256 and weighted average of 24.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,556,011 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 24.6%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 13.6% |
| Maximum | 62.4% | 80.0% |
| Range | 62.1% | 66.4% |
| Mean | 30.4% | 41.7% |
| Median | 28.3% | 38.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 48.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 13.3% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 65 to 74
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (24.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Barbadian (24.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Nigerian (24.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Thailand (24.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and Iraqi (24.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Native Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 8.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 8.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bermudans | 8.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Iraqis | 8.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Nigerians | 7.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Celtics | 6.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Barbadians | 6.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 5.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Bahamians | 4.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Panamanians | 4.2 /100 | #234 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 3.8 /100 | #235 | Tragic 24.4% |
| German Russians | 3.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 24.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Creek (30.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Choctaw (30.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Native/Alaskan (30.4%, a difference of 0.62%), Hopi (30.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and Colville (30.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 29.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 29.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |