Menominee In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Menominee
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Menominee In Labor Force | Age 35-44
79.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Menominee In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,777,730 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.434 and weighted average of 79.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.19% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Menominee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Menominee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Menominee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Menominee by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Menominee In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Menominee Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
Minimum | 0.023% | 33.3% |
Maximum | 85.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 85.2% | 66.7% |
Mean | 24.5% | 81.7% |
Median | 7.1% | 83.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 77.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.1% | 91.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 64.5% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.4% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 31.8% | 14.2% |
Correlation Details
Menominee Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.023% | 45,255,288 | 83.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 288,301 | 84.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 151,079 | 86.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 27,371 | 83.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 4,656 | 82.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 1,837 | 93.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 4,365 | 91.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 3,133 | 78.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 2,165 | 90.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 521 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 130 | 90.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 234 | 80.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 593 | 92.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.04% | 1,605 | 85.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 16,657 | 76.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 2,101 | 96.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.77% | 297 | 80.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.05% | 9,212 | 69.4% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.14% | 1,530 | 53.9% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.10% | 173 | 33.3% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.86% | 3,053 | 67.8% |
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.87% | 1,170 | 88.2% |
[ 76.0% - 76.5% ] 76.00% | 150 | 100.0% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.29% | 685 | 77.1% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.18% | 1,424 | 77.0% |