Immigrants from Ecuador In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Immigrants from Ecuador In Labor Force | Age 35-44
84.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
15.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,930,816 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149 and weighted average of 84.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.16% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Ecuador and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Ecuador influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Immigrants from Ecuador simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are New Zealander (84.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Israeli (84.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Bangladeshi (84.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North America (84.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Swiss (84.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Canadians | 19.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 84.2% |
Immigrants from Canada | 19.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 84.2% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica | 19.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.2% |
Laotians | 19.0 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.2% |
Immigrants from North America | 18.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 84.2% |
Swiss | 17.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 84.2% |
New Zealanders | 16.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 15.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 84.1% |
Israelis | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 84.1% |
Bangladeshis | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants from Barbados | 13.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 84.1% |
Europeans | 12.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 84.1% |
Nicaraguans | 12.1 /100 | #216 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants from Norway | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua | 9.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 84.1% |
Immigrants from Ecuador In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
Minimum | 0.080% | 59.8% |
Maximum | 28.3% | 98.2% |
Range | 28.2% | 38.4% |
Mean | 7.6% | 83.8% |
Median | 6.7% | 84.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 81.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 86.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 6.1% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Ecuador Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.080% | 209,744,976 | 83.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 26,063,275 | 85.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 8,421,513 | 84.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 5,752,487 | 84.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 12,135,239 | 83.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 2,095,819 | 85.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 989,395 | 83.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 900,350 | 86.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 615,613 | 83.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 374,254 | 79.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 349,510 | 82.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 170,748 | 83.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 177,201 | 87.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 145,666 | 85.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.29% | 203,298 | 81.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 212,515 | 85.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.88% | 384,726 | 84.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 108,545 | 86.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 38,623 | 72.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 241,294 | 86.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.03% | 506,053 | 81.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.37% | 44,256 | 84.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 170,386 | 82.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 7.00% | 87,829 | 89.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 167,696 | 86.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.68% | 32,177 | 75.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 128,918 | 84.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14% | 117,803 | 90.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.37% | 124,391 | 82.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.03% | 58,717 | 89.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.41% | 5,864 | 84.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.66% | 28,230 | 78.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.94% | 79,800 | 86.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30% | 14,649 | 85.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.62% | 640 | 98.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.89% | 8,776 | 89.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 8,178 | 80.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.30% | 21,040 | 79.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 6,951 | 94.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.02% | 10,026 | 75.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 4,407 | 59.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.14% | 112,750 | 84.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.50% | 5,587 | 96.4% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.80% | 57,927 | 79.2% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.33% | 2,718 | 77.5% |