Laotian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Laotian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
84.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
19.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,767,288 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 84.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.27% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Laotians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Laotians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Laotians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Laotians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Costa Rica (84.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Canadian (84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Canada (84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and Swiss (84.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Moroccans | 23.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 84.2% |
British | 23.0 /100 | #201 | Fair 84.2% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 22.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 84.2% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 22.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 84.2% |
Canadians | 19.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 84.2% |
Immigrants from Canada | 19.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 84.2% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica | 19.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.2% |
Laotians | 19.0 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.2% |
Immigrants from North America | 18.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 84.2% |
Swiss | 17.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 84.2% |
New Zealanders | 16.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 15.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 84.1% |
Israelis | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 84.1% |
Bangladeshis | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants from Barbados | 13.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 84.1% |
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
Minimum | 0.051% | 46.8% |
Maximum | 26.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.9% | 53.2% |
Mean | 4.3% | 81.1% |
Median | 2.8% | 83.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 78.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 86.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 11.5% |
Correlation Details
Laotian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.051% | 165,540,101 | 84.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 36,365,562 | 84.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 10,250,564 | 84.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 5,490,936 | 84.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,241,235 | 84.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 2,036,833 | 85.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 813,243 | 82.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 621,139 | 83.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 173,984 | 88.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 208,791 | 79.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 162,834 | 85.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 158,717 | 81.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 18,184 | 81.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 235,830 | 84.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 45,829 | 80.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 112,979 | 82.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 59,281 | 80.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 44,033 | 86.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 19,498 | 83.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 9,634 | 86.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 12,809 | 89.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 51,720 | 95.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 6,414 | 62.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 2,215 | 82.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 12,478 | 81.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 1,304 | 46.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 890 | 72.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 4,150 | 91.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 2,123 | 95.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 26,556 | 78.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 1,692 | 62.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 1,392 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 722 | 68.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 1,881 | 89.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 23,842 | 74.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.58% | 319 | 74.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 619 | 81.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 2,756 | 85.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 236 | 75.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.94% | 1,634 | 56.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 1,220 | 51.1% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.91% | 566 | 100.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.97% | 543 | 100.0% |