Immigrants from Ethiopia In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Immigrants from Ethiopia In Labor Force | Age 35-44
85.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,503,517 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 85.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ethiopia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.42% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Ethiopia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Ethiopia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Immigrants from Ethiopia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Ethiopian (85.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Cape Verdean (85.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Cameroon (85.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (86.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 86.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 86.4% |
| Immigrants from Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 86.2% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 86.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 86.1% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 86.1% |
| Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 86.1% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 85.9% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 85.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Immigrants from Cameroon | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
| Minimum | 0.061% | 59.3% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 32.9% | 40.7% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 85.5% |
| Median | 4.4% | 86.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 84.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 88.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 7.5% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Ethiopia Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.061% | 150,633,311 | 83.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 25,215,024 | 85.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 13,381,466 | 85.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 4,755,068 | 86.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 3,448,104 | 86.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 2,595,276 | 87.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 2,698,114 | 86.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 1,602,876 | 87.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 1,248,866 | 87.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 987,685 | 86.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 716,562 | 85.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.91% | 440,302 | 86.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 336,758 | 88.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 200,034 | 84.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 224,276 | 86.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 255,766 | 86.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 405,740 | 85.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 295,675 | 88.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 219,632 | 85.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 166,439 | 88.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 110,229 | 91.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.59% | 62,723 | 82.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 163,783 | 86.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.86% | 263,076 | 90.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.00% | 86,662 | 85.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 33,847 | 89.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.37% | 4,161 | 62.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 73,074 | 83.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 75,806 | 80.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.95% | 4,023 | 60.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 25,324 | 80.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.37% | 29,132 | 83.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 11,716 | 84.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 97,661 | 81.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 152,984 | 87.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.24% | 4,425 | 59.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.35% | 56,737 | 90.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 81,808 | 88.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.69% | 73,292 | 85.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.82% | 23,505 | 87.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.14% | 75,534 | 90.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 30,927 | 85.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.54% | 17,542 | 93.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.71% | 27,523 | 88.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.75% | 37,207 | 90.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.50% | 18,324 | 81.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 535 | 86.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.17% | 15,489 | 79.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 14,553 | 76.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.07% | 82 | 100.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.25% | 4,572 | 90.4% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.48% | 105 | 100.0% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.97% | 182 | 100.0% |