Hungarian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Hungarian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Hungarian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
16.5%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
47.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,859,251 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 16.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.5% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hungarians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hungarians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Hungarians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Scotch-Irish (16.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (16.5%, a difference of 0.060%), White/Caucasian (16.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Syria (16.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Hawaiian (16.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants from Colombia | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Uruguayans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants from Syria | 49.0 /100 | #175 | Average 16.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 48.2 /100 | #176 | Average 16.5% |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Celtics | 40.6 /100 | #184 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants from Western Asia | 40.4 /100 | #185 | Average 16.6% |
Hmong | 38.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.6% |
Hungarian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.21% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 53.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.5% | 95.3% |
Mean | 14.9% | 36.7% |
Median | 10.4% | 26.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 51.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 37.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 28.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 28.5% |
Correlation Details
Hungarian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 351,550,343 | 17.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 82,187,403 | 13.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 20,208,765 | 13.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 7,973,091 | 14.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 3,616,163 | 13.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 1,959,503 | 14.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 1,648,875 | 16.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,214,940 | 18.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 820,097 | 15.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 418,343 | 10.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 397,673 | 26.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 105,860 | 17.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 132,972 | 26.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 91,814 | 11.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.09% | 45,688 | 14.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.75% | 61,023 | 25.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 31,947 | 8.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.67% | 14,193 | 30.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.18% | 7,733 | 40.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 3,923 | 27.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.37% | 3,470 | 26.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 53,135 | 43.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 24,194 | 6.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 9,240 | 4.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.05% | 75,143 | 39.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.67% | 221 | 100.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.26% | 377 | 26.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.85% | 164 | 100.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 47,509 | 46.4% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.42% | 1,792 | 10.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.35% | 28,287 | 56.3% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 7,385 | 25.9% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.64% | 63,011 | 38.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.30% | 5,501 | 66.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.04% | 192 | 91.7% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.96% | 3,858 | 58.3% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 9,578 | 75.6% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.81% | 34,395 | 45.0% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.06% | 962 | 81.0% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.79% | 315 | 84.6% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.76% | 173 | 100.0% |