Chickasaw vs Hmong In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Hmong
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Chickasaw
Hmong
38.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Hmong In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,579,210 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 38.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,681,034 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 38.7%, a difference of 1.0%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Hmong |
Minimum | 7.1% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 71.4% | 64.2% |
Range | 64.3% | 61.1% |
Mean | 36.5% | 38.1% |
Median | 37.5% | 39.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.4% | 31.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.8% | 43.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Hmong by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Nepal (38.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (38.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Colville (38.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Hawaiian (38.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Zimbabwean (38.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cameroon (38.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (38.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Hmong | 99.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Iraqis | 98.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Delaware | 98.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Bulgarians | 97.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Colville | 97.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Chickasaw | 97.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 97.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 97.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 38.3% |