Yuman vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Yuman
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Yuman
Chickasaw
43.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,496 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.526 and weighted average of 43.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 6.0%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 20.0% |
| Maximum | 60.2% | 65.4% |
| Range | 56.2% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 41.8% | 47.8% |
| Median | 42.7% | 48.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.0% | 43.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.1% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.0% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ethiopian (43.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
| Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
| Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
| Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
| Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
| Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
| Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |