Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Chickasaw
45.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,690 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.224 and weighted average of 45.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 0.44%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 20.8% | 20.0% |
Maximum | 75.4% | 65.4% |
Range | 54.6% | 45.4% |
Mean | 46.6% | 47.8% |
Median | 45.7% | 48.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.8% | 43.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.1% | 53.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Potawatomi (45.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (45.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Central America (45.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Alaska Native (45.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Ottawa (45.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |
Alaska Natives | 13.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 45.6% |
Aleuts | 12.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 45.6% |
Nepalese | 11.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 45.6% |
Uruguayans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 45.5% |
Immigrants | France | 8.8 /100 | #207 | Tragic 45.4% |