Jordanian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Jordanian
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Jordanians
Chickasaw
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,389,697 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 48.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 5.5%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 23.6% | 20.0% |
Maximum | 83.7% | 65.4% |
Range | 60.1% | 45.4% |
Mean | 51.6% | 47.8% |
Median | 50.9% | 48.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.2% | 43.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.8% | 53.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Northern European (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | China | 98.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | North America | 98.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Laotians | 98.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 98.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |